One of the glorious aspects of the internet is the ability to voice one’s outrage almost as soon as you have it to as wide an audience as you can find. While usually, I try to calm down a bit before I spew out my irritation upon an unsuspecting public, today I feel little remorse in dipping my virtual quill into a jar of bile and vitrol and scribbling upon the imaginary paper you see before you. The cause for this teeth grinding, stomach tightening irritation: The proposed NY soda tax .
The gist of it is this: New York state’s 2009 budget includes an 18% tax on sodas, sugary soft drinks and fruit drinks under 70% juice. This in theory would be used to fight obesity and raise awareness. It’s being likened to the higher taxes on cigarettes and Govenor David Paterson is saying this is a necessary step in the battle against childhood obesity and diabetes.
I won’t say that obesity isn’t a problem, even if I think the standard by which obesity is determined is arbitrary. There is a point where excess body fat has negative health impacts and that’s a serious problem. As this is a blog about diabetes, I obviously am not going to say that that isn’t an issue either. So why does this thought anger me? Because it’s a sin tax, and sin taxes are wrong.
Taxation is one of the big sticks a government can wield, on par with military force. “The power to tax is the power to destory” it has been said. In theory, taxation is to raise monies necessary for the government to do it’s job, but properly applied it can be a blunt instrument used to enforce the will of the state.
Sin taxes are mommy government cutting your allowance; it’s not the government’s job to be a parent to the populace.
Besides that, when a tax like this gets proposed, it usually gets defeated because of who it targets the most: the poor. Cheap food is made with a lot of sweeteners so that it will be palatable. I’m not saying this is a good plan and it’s one of the things that I feel is a shame upon the fast food and mass produced food markets. But raising taxes on the sweet stuff means raising taxes on the cheap stuff which means hurting poor people.
Does anyone need or have to drink soda? No. Do some people do it because it’s cheap? Yep.
Then there’s the standard by which they’re choosing drinks. Consider that 8oz of soda, chocolate milk, unsweetened apple juice or orange juice all have about the same amount of carbs (within 5 grams). How many of those are going to get taxed again? Sure, the last three all have vitamins, but so does Glaceau Vitamin Water… which would be taxed and has less sugar per serving than any of these.
Most importantly, taxes like this skirt the actual issue involved, that being the matter of personal responsibility. I got to be a type 2 diabetic by consuming about a gallon of soda every 48 hours for 15 years combined with not really supplementing my diet with much else of any nutritional value. I blame no one for this but myself. The day I found out that I was diabetic, I stopped drinking soda. I reject the idea that I or anyone else can’t avoid soda if they choose and have to be forced into a better choice.
Not to mention, we’re talking about childhood obesity here. The adults are the one’s supplying the soda most of the time, I imagine. Do you think that upping the cost is going to make them suddenly buy healthy drinks or simply serve the same thing and grumble about the price of groceries?
Be it a tax on cigarettes, a tax on booze or a tax on soda, you don’t get the result you want until you change the people. Until then, you’re merely profitting off of people’s bad behavior because as a society we’ve failed to teach ourselves moderation. I don’t doubt that we need to do something to make sure that the next genaration doesn’t all die of heart failure by the time they’re 40, but I find the idea that we should do that by poking the wallets of people an offensive and dangerous concept.
After all, what else do we think is a problem that we can tax? What does the government have to target before we see that such practices for the rude extortion that they are? Do we really have the right to say stay healthy or pay up?
Me, I don’t think so.